Index

e-ISSN 1828-1427

 

Rivista trimestrale di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria edita dall'Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise ‘G. Caporale’

A quarterly journal devoted to veterinary public health, veterinary science and medicine published by the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise ‘G. Caporale’ in Teramo, Italy


Editorial policy
Copyright and disclaimers
Guidelines for Authors
Editors
Honorary Members
Editorial Board
Scientific Advisory Board
Associate Editors
Issues online
Tariffs
Contact
 

ISSUES ONLINE

2004 - Volume 40 (4), October-December
   
 
F. Monaco, B. Bonfini, M. Zaghini, D. Antonucci, A. Pini & G. Savini
Vaccination of cattle using modified-live monovalent vaccine against bluetongue virus serotype 2: innocuity, immunogenicity and effect on pregnancy 671-675
       

Summary
The immunogenicity, innocuity and possible teratogenic effects of the monovalent modified-live vaccine against bluetongue (BT) virus (BTV) serotype 2, manufactured by Onderstepoort Biological Products in South Africa, was evaluated in cows. Twenty-one cows, 14 of which were at different stages of gestation, were vaccinated with 2 ml of monovalent vaccine; two served as unvaccinated controls. After immunisation, 16 vaccinated and the 2 unvaccinated controls were kept in the field; the remaining 5 pregnant cows were maintained in an insect-proof stable with a controlled environment. Blood samples were taken from field cattle once a week for two months and from the stable cattle three times a week. All samples were screened for the presence of BTV and for BT antibody using the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA) and the virus neutralisation (VN) test. Intravenous egg inoculation, followed by two blind passages in Vero cells, was used to isolate BTV-2 from ethylene-diaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA) blood samples and virus titres in viraemic animals were determined. After immunisation, 9 of the cows developed a viraemia which commenced on day 7 post vaccination (pv) and lasted for three weeks. The virus titres were never higher than 10 2.8 TCID 50 /ml with the highest titre observed on day 14 pv. None of the vaccinated animals developed clinical symptoms that could be attributed to BTV; after three weeks all animals showed a serological response to BTV-2. In the c-ELISA, antibodies were detected from day 7 pv while in the VN test, antibodies were observed from day 21 pv. All pregnant cows completed their gestation: 13 gave birth to healthy calves, while one of those in the field group, vaccinated at the six months gestation, delivered a calf with prosencephalic hypoplasia, possibly developed during foetal organogenesis prior to vaccination. Fourteen months after immunisation the stabled cows were challenged subcutaneously by administering 2 × 10 6.8 TCID 50 BTV-2 Italian isolate. A third group of 4 cows was also inoculated with the BTV-2 Italian field isolate, as described for the second group and was used as the unvaccinated positive control group. Vaccinated cows had a detectable viraemia only on day 14 pv and virus titres were very low. Virus titres never exceeded 10 2.3 TCID 50 /ml, while the unvaccinated group developed a long and intense viraemia, peaking on day 14 pv with a titre of 1.18 × 10 4. It is concluded that the BTV-2 modified-live vaccine used in this study was a harmless and effective immunogen that did not cross the placental membrane.

Keywords
Bluetongue, Cattle, Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Immunogenicity, Innocuity, Italy, Pregnancy, Teratogenic effect, Vaccine, Virus, Virus neutralisation.


Full article

     
 
    © Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise 2004